Papers
-
5 Aug
DoD Public Comments -
18 Mar
House Resolution: H.R. 7401 Contract Our Veterans Act of 2024
The National Defense Authorization Act of 2024 raises the government-wide goal of awarding contracts to service-disabled veteran-owned small businesses from 3 percent to 5 percent. There is no goal for awarding contracts to veteran-owned small businesses. H.R. 7401 would establish a veteran-owned small business goal in the Department of Defense (DoD) of 5 percent of contract awards to veteran-owned small businesses.
H.R. 7401 also provides DoD with a mechanism to reach these goals similar to the special authorities provided to the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) known as “VETS First”. Under VETS First, VA is authorized to set-aside” contract opportunities with competition restricted to veteran and service-disabled veteran-owned small businesses. The result of VETS First at VA has been an exponential rise in contract awards. Prior to VETS First VA awarded approximately 3 percent
-
14 Jun
Introduction:Talking points paper to discuss ongoing issues with current VA MSPV program and expectations of problems to follow MSPV Gen – Z contracts when awarded. SDV-MPG members met with Senate and House Veterans Affairs Committees majority and minority staffs in June 2023.
VA’S MEDICAL/SURGICAL PRIME VENDOR PROGRAM
OPERATIONAL CHALLENGES
April 2023
Our members continue to face challenges with the MSPV program. We polled our membership and the following four categories consistently inhibit their ability to succeed. We hope this document will provide a guide for our discussion moving forward.
1. LACK OF COMMAND STRUCTURE:
- Responsibility for program resides in
-
25 May
The Non-Manufacturer Rule Waiver Impact to SDVOSBs -
15 Feb
Introduction: Provided to VA MSPV staff to highlight the issues facing SDV-MPG members brought on by VA’s failure to timely and reasonable deal with BPA price increase submissions.
SDV-MPG CONCERNS WITH PRICING OF PRODUCTS FOR VA’S MSPV PROGRAM
February 2023
BACKGROUND: Almost 3 years ago, VA negotiated and awarded Blanket Purchaser Agreements (BPAs) for products to be provided to VA through VA’s MSPV program. Most of the BPAs were awarded to SDVOSBs. Awards were based on “fair and reasonable” pricing in a competitive bidding process. To develop their bid price suppliers used their latest manufacturer’s price, added markups to cover business expenses, MSPV program costs (specific to the MSPV program) and a modest profit. Over the past three years, due to COVID demands and high inflation rates, product prices have risen, in some cases substantially.
-
12 Jan
Introduction: Questions submitted to VA MSPV staff based on the release of the final RFP for MSPV Gen-Z.
QUESTIONS TO VA BASED ON RFP ISSUED ON JANUARY 3RD, 2023
1. The RFP addresses Organizational Conflicts of Interest (OCIs) by requiring respondents to self-identify any real or perceived OCI issues. The RFP further requires the respondents to develop and submit to VA a “mitigation plan” addressing the OCI issues. We understand VA has determined it either has, or will, provide “waivers” to any prime vendor who also holds BPAs under the MSPV program, namely Cardinal and Medline. As the proposals including any identification of OCI issues have not yet been submitted, under what authority and justification has VA provided waivers? We respectfully request copies of any waivers and justifications for the waivers VA has established. Also, what effect will Public Law 117-324; “Preventing Organizational Conflicts of Interest
-
6 Dec
Introduction: SDV-MPG letter to VA MSPV contracting officer on concerns raised by the publication of the draft RFP for MSPV-Gen Z.
December 6, 2022
BY EMAIL: [email protected]
Ashley Nguyen, Contracting Officer, 36C10X
Strategic Acquisition Center – Frederick
Department of Veterans Affairs
5202 Presidents Court, Suite 103
Frederick, MD 21703
Re: MSPV-Gen Z Draft RFP.
Dear Ms. Nguyen:
I hope you and your team had an excellent Thanksgiving holiday.
As you know, the undersigned has the privilege of serving as the Executive Director of the Service Disabled Veteran Medical Products Group (SDV-MPG), a not-for-profit industry group that represents numerous medical product
-
20 Sep
Introduction: Summary of Congressional Hearing on “VA Major Acquisitions Failure: In Search of Solutions”.
Congressional Hearing Summary
Committee: House Veterans Affairs – Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations and Subcommittee on Technology Modernization
Subject: VA Major Acquisitions Failures: In Search of Solutions
Date: 9/20/2022
Members Present
Chairman Pappas (D-NH) Rep. Mann (R-KS)
Rep. Takano (D-CA)
-
10 Aug
Introduction: Provided by SDV-MPG members to Senate and House Veterans Affairs Committee staffs to provide background on the issues faced by service-disabled veteran-owned small businesses in operating as a “distributor” under VA’s MSPV program.
RISKY BUSINESS
THE PLIGHT OF A SERVICE-DISABLED VETERAN-OWNED SMALL BUSINESS PARTICIPATING
IN VA’S MEDICAL/SURGICAL PRIME VENDOR PROGRAM
Presented by
THE SERVICE-DISABLED VETERAN MEDICAL PRODUCTS GROUP
August 2022
SUMMARY: The service-disabled veteran-owned small business (SDVOSB) community has been involved and interested in the success of the VA Medical/Surgical Prime Vendor Program (MSPV) program since its inception. This involvement was heightened with the passage of Public Law 109-461 in 2006 and
-
22 Jul
Introduction: Provided to VA MSPV staff to identify the concerns raised by SDV-MPG members during meeting on July 21st regarding VA and DLA MSPV programs.
SDV-MPG CONCERNS BY CATEGORY
July, 2022
Members of the SDV-MPG have identified a number of issues regarding VA’s MSPV program as well as the proposed use of DLA’s MSPV program by VA. The issues identified are as follows:
SUPPLY BPA’s
1. VAMC’s have not provided prime vendors with usage data so prime vendors do not stock and order from Supply BPA holders.
2. The result of #1 is a high number of drop ship orders which causes additional expenses.
3. Another result of #1 is prime vendors not assigning prime vendor ordering numbers (PVONs) which causes further delays and confusion for obtaining specific products by VAMCs.
4. VA cannot process the number